Skip to contentdotlaw

Specialization: Corporate law

Organizational efficiency is a competitive advantage.

Corporate law that builds structure without slowing down decisions. Corporate governance, employment law, tax structuring, due diligence, and ESOPs in Wrocław and across Poland.

Specialization: Corporate law

Trusted by

Tooploox
justjoin.it
CodeTwo
Toggl
Spyrosoft
Symfonia
Tooploox
justjoin.it
CodeTwo
Toggl
Spyrosoft
Symfonia
Tooploox
justjoin.it
CodeTwo
Toggl
Spyrosoft
Symfonia

We know your business model

What we do in the area of corporate law.

Legal support for a company is not a one-off intervention. It is an architecture of processes, documents, and structures matched to your company's growth stage and the business model you operate in.

Corporate governance and company structure

Designing a corporate structure matched to your growth stage: a limited liability company, PSA, holding company, group structure, or limited partnership. Handling shareholder meetings and general meetings, management board and supervisory board rules. Corporate disputes between shareholders. Your company set up so that decisions are fast and responsibility is clear.

Employment law and remuneration

Legal support in employment law and employment matters broadly for technology companies: work and remuneration rules, employment contracts, and civil-law management contracts. Implementing employee stock option plans (ESOPs). The pay transparency directive: audit and implementation. Whistleblower protection: internal reporting procedures and documentation. Your team operates within a framework that is fair, clear, and compliant with the law.

Tax structuring

Optimizing the tax structure for technology companies operating in Poland and abroad. Withholding tax (WHT), holding structuring, VAT settlements on the sale of software and digital services abroad. A family foundation for technology company owners. Your company pays as much tax as it has to, no more.

Transactions and investments

Legal and tax due diligence before an investment or acquisition. Term sheet negotiations, investment agreements, financing round documentation. Preparing a company for subsequent investment rounds. Your negotiating position defined before the investor enters the data room.

Problems we know

Where technology companies lose their edge.

A company structure designed for the company you used to be, not the one you are

The company has grown, but the corporate structure is still the same as at the start. A single management board, no decision-making processes, no rules. As shareholders, investors, and markets are added, the lack of corporate governance becomes a brake, not just a formality. Corporate architecture has to scale together with the company.

A pay scale with no architecture ahead of the pay transparency directive

From 2026, companies with more than 100 employees will have to report pay gaps and disclose salary ranges. IT companies with unstructured pay scales face a real risk of deepening pay inequalities, which will be ruthlessly exposed once the national rules take effect, making it far easier for employees to pursue claims. Preparing a transparent pay structure before the deadline costs a fraction of responding to claims after it.

The whistleblower procedure that has been missing since September 2024

Every company with more than 50 employees must have an internal reporting procedure for whistleblowers in place. The absence of a procedure is a direct violation of the act and a risk that the first serious incident goes straight to external authorities or the media, instead of being efficiently resolved within the company. Implementing the right procedures is a week of work, not a six-month project.

Foreign payments without WHT verification

Software licenses, cloud services, payments to foreign contractors. Each of these payments may be subject to withholding tax. The Polish company as remitter is responsible for correctly collecting and remitting it. A failure to verify is a risk of tax arrears with interest accruing from the payment date.

An ESOP promised to people, undocumented on paper

The company promises options to key people, but the plan has no documentation, grant rules, or tax rationale. An undocumented ESOP is not motivation, it is a liability that will catch founders off guard at an investor's exit or a sale of the company. The plan's architecture has to be ready before you start promising it.

Corporate governance under NIS2 without management board approval

NIS2 requires the management board to actively oversee cybersecurity and bear responsibility for incidents. Security policies have to be approved by the management board, not just by the IT department. IT companies that don't have this built into their corporate structure expose board members to personal liability, regardless of the scale of the incident.

Why dotlaw

Four pillars of working with us

Practicality

We are your partner. We don't describe legal risk in the abstract and we don't leave you with text along the lines of "on the one hand, on the other hand." We close every matter with a concrete recommendation. Our legal solutions are meant to grow your business.

Flexibility

We support companies in a model that fits their growth stage: from project-based support on a specific agreement, through ongoing retainer support, to a fractional in-house model that works like an internal legal department. A form of cooperation tailored to you.

AI-native

We have backed our services with GenAI from the very start. In line with the European guidelines we helped author, we shift into a higher gear of efficiency. This lets us work effectively even on the most complex matters.

Legal design

We design contracts, manuals, and guidelines so that your team reads and understands them without any trouble. Legal documents that can't be understood will never be effective.

How we start

From the first conversation to the first result.

A conversation, 20 minutes.

No briefs, no forms. You tell us how your company works, what you're planning, and what's blocking you. We tell you straight whether and how we can help, and where to start.

An action plan in 48h.

Whatever the scale, within 48 hours you know how we'll define the scope of work, what priorities we recommend, and when you'll get a quote. No dragging it out. No lines like "we'll get back to you."

Full onboarding in a week.

A week from the date the agreement is signed is all it takes. Our lawyers are fully up to speed on your business, company structure, and industry context. We start working, with no warm-up period at all.

FAQ

Questions we hear
most often.

An ESOP in a Polish limited liability company (sp. z o.o.), simple joint-stock company (PSA), or joint-stock company (S.A.) requires several elements: a shareholders' resolution on a conditional capital increase or a pool of phantom shares, an option plan policy setting out the grant rules, vesting schedule, and exit terms, as well as tax documentation defining when income arises on the employee's side. In a limited liability company, virtual shares (phantom equity) are most commonly used, while classic subscription warrants can be successfully implemented in a PSA or S.A., with each solution carrying different tax consequences. An undocumented ESOP is a liability that will catch founders off guard at an investor's exit or a sale of the company. The plan's architecture has to be ready before you start promising it to your key people.

A term sheet is a non-binding document setting out the terms of an investment before the actual agreements are signed. The key elements to pay attention to are the pre-money valuation and the cap table after the investment, exit priority rights (liquidation preference in either a 1x non-participating or participating variant), anti-dilution rights, drag-along and tag-along rights, operational restrictions requiring the investor's consent (reserved matters), and clauses concerning subsequent rounds. A term sheet is non-binding as a rule, but the terms set out in it become the starting point for negotiating the actual documentation. Changing unfavorable provisions after the term sheet has been signed is many times harder than before it is accepted.

Legal due diligence covers an analysis of five main areas: the corporate structure, including shareholders and the history of changes; intellectual property, including legal title to the code and trademarks; key contracts with clients and suppliers; the status of employees and B2B contractors; and any liabilities and litigation. The result of the work is a professional report with a map of gaps and a risk assessment, not just a list of documents. For a seller, conducting the review before the process makes it possible to close gaps before the investor enters the data room and prices them in as risk.

Preparing a company for subsequent investment rounds starts at least 6 months before the planned closing of the round. The most critical areas are securing legal title to the IP through appropriate agreements with developers, full documentation of existing ESOPs, an up-to-date and consistent corporate structure, the absence of unresolved shareholder disputes, complete employee and contractor documentation, and full GDPR compliance. In subsequent rounds, the investor carries out full due diligence, so every material gap means either a lower valuation or a condition precedent to closing the transaction. Your company should pass this review without any surprises.

The simple joint-stock company (PSA) was designed with startups and technology companies in mind. The main differences compared with a limited liability company are the complete absence of a minimum share capital, which in a limited liability company is PLN 5,000; the ability to take up shares in exchange for a contribution of work or services, which makes it easier to implement ESOPs and to bring in a founder without cash; a simplified governing-body structure; and the option of online registration within 24 hours. The downsides of the PSA are lower recognition among foreign investors and counterparties, and less case law and market practice. For a company planning a round with a foreign VC fund, the classic limited liability company or joint-stock company is still more often preferred by investors.

A holding structure makes sense when a company reaches operational maturity and faces decisions about diversification, protecting assets, or tax optimization. The main reasons are separating operational risk across the individual subsidiaries; exempting dividends paid from subsidiaries to the holding company from tax where shares above 10% are held for a period of 2 years; making it easier for an investor to exit a single subsidiary without selling the whole group; and protecting the owner's assets from operational risk. A holding company does, however, generate fixed costs, including additional accounting, maintaining a management board, or consolidated financial statements. The decision on a holding structure should precede an investment round or a significant acquisition, not come right after them.

A family foundation is an institution introduced into Polish law in 2023. It allows a company owner to contribute assets in the form of company shares, real estate, or cash to the foundation and to manage them for the beneficiaries according to set rules. The tax benefits include dividends and income from the foundation's activity being taxed only when paid out to beneficiaries, at a rate of 15% CIT, as well as the complete absence of tax when profits are reinvested within the foundation. For the owner of an IT company, it is a proven tool for succession planning, protecting assets from the company's operational risk, and tax optimization on exiting the company. A family foundation does not replace a holding company, but it can work alongside one as part of the structure.

The Whistleblower Protection Act of 2024 obliges companies employing more than 50 people to implement an internal reporting procedure. Implementation involves drawing up a procedure for receiving and handling reports, designating a person or unit responsible for handling reports, putting in place an internal reporting procedure based on a form, a mailbox, or a dedicated platform, consulting employee representatives, and informing the entire team about the procedure that has been implemented. The whistleblower is protected against retaliation, because the act places a presumption on the employer that any unfavorable action against a person reporting a breach constitutes retaliation. The absence of a procedure is a direct violation of the act and a risk that the first serious incident goes straight to external authorities or the media, instead of being efficiently resolved within the company.

EU Directive 2023/970 on pay transparency takes effect for companies with more than 100 employees from 2026, and for entities with more than 250 employees from 2027 as regards the first report. The key obligations are disclosing salary ranges in job advertisements, reporting the pay gap between women and men, the employee's right to information about pay in comparable positions, and a ban on asking about a candidate's pay history. For IT companies, unstructured pay scales, individually negotiated salaries, and the lack of clear job descriptions are the most common problems that the directive will expose, laying bare accumulated pay inequalities. This in turn will make it easier for employees to pursue any court claims. Preparing the pay structure before the national rules take effect is many times cheaper than fending off lawsuits later.

Every form of payout generates different tax and social-security consequences. A dividend payout is taxed at 19% capital gains tax with no social security (ZUS) contributions, but the funds are paid out of profit after CIT taxation, which means a combined burden of CIT at 9% or 19% plus 19% dividend tax. Management remuneration constitutes a deductible cost on the company's side, but gives rise to an obligation to pay social security (ZUS) contributions and income tax on the management board member's side. A B2B contract is flexible, but requires genuine economic independence, as the tax authorities increasingly challenge B2B agreements that conceal an actual employment relationship. The optimal structure depends on the level of remuneration, the company's legal form, and the owner's investment plans.

Withholding tax (WHT) is a tax collected by a Polish company acting as a remitter when paying certain amounts abroad for software licenses, intangible services such as advisory or management services, dividends, interest, or other license fees. The standard rate is 20% for intangible services and licenses. Double taxation treaties (DTTs) can reduce or eliminate it, but they require the recipient's tax residency certificate and meeting the beneficial owner test. For payments above PLN 2 million per year to a single entity, the pay and refund procedure applies. The Polish company as remitter is responsible for correctly collecting WHT, and an error means a tax arrears arising together with interest.

Crossing the threshold of 50 employees triggers a range of additional obligations. Work rules and remuneration rules become mandatory, as does a social fund (ZFŚS) or payment of a holiday benefit, though setting up a ZFŚS can be legally waived with the appropriate provisions in the remuneration rules; an internal reporting procedure for whistleblowers; and an anti-mobbing policy. At 100 employees, reporting the pay gap is added under the pay transparency directive from 2026, and at 250 employees, ESG reporting obligations arising from the CSRD directive. IT companies that grow fast often cross the thresholds without knowing what obligations this triggers, which is why an employment law audit at every significant increase in headcount is good practice.

Corporate disputes between shareholders most often concern the distribution of profit and dividend policy, the company's direction and management decisions, the valuation of shares on the exit of one of the shareholders, and breaches of the shareholders' agreement or the articles of association. The ways to resolve them include negotiation and mediation as the fastest and cheapest methods, arbitration, which is effective where the shareholders' agreement contains an arbitration clause, or traditional court proceedings, which can be long, costly, and public. Prevention rests on a well-drafted shareholders' agreement with exit mechanisms including call and put options, drag-along, tag-along, or a shotgun clause, as well as clear rules for making decisions. A dispute is not won by the one who is right, it is won by the one who has the better agreement.

NIS2 places on the management bodies of entities covered by the directive an obligation of active oversight of cybersecurity and personal liability for breaches. This means that security policies have to be approved by the management board, not just by the IT department. Corporate governance under NIS2 requires putting cybersecurity on the agenda of the management board and the supervisory board, documenting management decisions concerning security risks, training management board members in cybersecurity, and implementing security policies approved by a management board resolution. IT companies, as essential or important entities under NIS2, are covered by the broadest scope of obligations. The absence of documentation at the management board level is a risk of personal liability for board members, regardless of whether an incident has occurred.

Let's start. 20 minutes is enough.

You tell us what you're building and what's blocking you. You get a concrete answer.

Get in touch